The Sleeping Buddy

An interactive cuddly toy to bring along to bed to help you sleep or soothes you in the night when you wake. Which kid would not like to have one? And in the care for the mentally disabled it could also help a lot of people.

Charged by Robots that Care and Sherpa, a care facility where Jeroen works part time, a group of young students has started to design a Sleeping Buddy. This is done at a Duthc Technasium, for the Research and Design lessons which are the core of that school.

A first impression of the Sleeping Buddy

The idea behind this cuddlebot is that it can measure sleep using various sensors, and that it can try to improve sleep, through display-options (lichts, music, etc.) and the interaction with the problematic sleeper (for example through joining and calming their heartbeat or breathing frequency).

A similar development is taking place at Somnox. Or, to be honest, they are a bit further :-)

But with this initiative Sylvia Loos is involved, of Nyx Zorg voor Slaap and of Sherpa. She and Theo of Nyx have a very large experience with sleeping problems of people with mental disabilities and they are helping to achieve a good design.

Posted in Children, Huggable robots, Slapen, Touching People | Leave a comment

Must-See: A Robotic Dog’s Mortality (NY Times)

The link to the full story

Posted in Huggable robots, Social Robotics | Leave a comment

EU Call for Projects on Health, Aging and Robotics

There is an interesting active EU Call for Projects on Health, Aging and Robotics.

TOPIC : EU-Japan cooperation on Novel ICT Robotics based solutions for active and healthy ageing at home or in care facilities

Topic identifier: SC1-PM-14-2016
Publication date: 14 October 2015
Types of action: RIA Research and Innovation action
Opening date: 20 October 2015
Deadline: 07 June 2016 17:00:00

For more information and explanations, see

This call is part of the big Horizon 2020 programme.

Pillar: Societal Challenges
Work Programme Year: H2020-2016-2017
Work Programme Part: Health, demographic change and well-being

Call identifier: H2020-SC1-2016-2017

Posted in Elderly | Leave a comment

A visit to the USA, the DARPA Challenge 2015

Besides the trade shows and Japan, the ‘DARPA Challenges’, from the USA, are also nice to watch. There you see robots performing in various dream scenarios. And you also get to see them fall and fail in conditions that resemble the real world (a kind of challenging track with asignments).

The DARPA Challenge 2015 (Motherboard)

Interestingly, the South Korean team of KAIST won the grand prize of two million dollars.

Posted in Robotics | Leave a comment

Robots of Japan, 2015

Besides visiting trade shows , visiting Japan is also worthwhile to keep up with developments in robotics. Not fond of flying or short on budget? The internet helps!

Here is a nice filmpje by Motherboard with a travel report from Japan. The makers searched for ‘Robot hotels’ and also spoke to people actually spending the night there.

Inside the Japanese Hotel Staffed by Robots (by Motherboard)

By far the most interesting I found the reactions of the actual users at the end of the movie. I believe these reactions show that the Japanese are not that different from other people when it comes to robots. These reactions could easily have come from a group of Dutch people.

Posted in Hospitality | Leave a comment

A Robotics Show in the year 2015

It is good to visit trade shows on robotics. It gives you a good overview of the possibilities and the most important main stream developments in the industry.

Here is a recent clip from ‘Automate 2015′. It is fairly long, but I believe it provides a very nice overview of where the markets and the industry are at the moment. These are the things where people in robotics earn a living on, now and for the next five years or so. The Automate Show is held every two year in Michigan (US).

In the Netherlands there is a similar event every year, that I highly recommend: The Vision & Robotics trade show in Veldhoven. This year on June 1 en 2.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Item on Robot Zora and other Healthcare Robots

Sorry, this entry is only available in Nederlands.

Posted in Elderly | Leave a comment

Veebot, a Design for a Robot that can Draw Blood

Er is een robot in de maak, in de US bij Stanford in de buurt, genaamd Veebot, die in de toekomst het bloed prikken grotendeels moet gaan automatiseren en de verpleegkundige moet ondersteunen bij het proces. Het idee is dat hierdoor bij het proces minder fout gaat, patiënten minder kans op schade hebben en de bijbehorende kosten daarmee dalen. Wat het apparaat zelf zou moeten gaan kosten is nog niet duidelijk. Het bedrijfje zelf, Veebot LCC, presenteert zijn ideeën wel op hun website maar treedt niet in details:

Here is a video report from PandoList about Veebot, from may 2012.

Meer nieuws hierover:

Posted in Medical Procedures, Touching People | Leave a comment

CHRIS movie about robots cooperating with humans

A European Social Robotics project called CHRIS (Cooperative Human Robot Interaction Systems FP7 215805) has received its final review last april. They have also created a very nice video that summarizes their work:

As the video shows, the work is about safe cooperation and it includes the recognition of gesture (pointing), speech, actions, and objects. It is quite interesting to see the capabilities of a 18 month old human child compared to what a robot can do (not much). Perhaps that is due to the fact that kids never worry about hurting their parents. They just go for it, and their mother will let them know when they are doing something they should not. That is a pwerful learning strategy.

I think the CHRIS video shows nicely what Humanoid robots can and can not be expected to be able to do. Most robots will not be able to do everything the iCub or Bert2 can do. CHRIS is at the cutting edge.

Posted in Social Robotics, Touching People | Leave a comment

Robot Size Matters

Size. With robots, does size matter? One might say size matters little if it works well and performs the job it was designed to do. From an engineering perspective one might even add ‘the smaller the better’ or ‘the cheaper the better’. But from a psychological perspective it may be very important how big a robot is. In the social interaction with humans a big robot may function differently than a small one. Big impresses, big attracts attention, big frightens. Small endears, small puts at ease. Those are just some associations that we should think about studying closer.

An interesting ongoing experiment with size is the work of Hajime Sakamoto and his Hajime Research Institute (a Japanese company building humanoid robots). He plans to build larger and larger robots that can walk on two feet, eventually ending up with a ´Gundam´ robot that can seat a human (co)pilot, as featured in the famous SF-cartoons (of which Hajime is a fan). A fairly recent prototype can be seen in the following movie:

Recent progress reported here by PlasticPals.

Another nice example of the effect of a big robot size is the fake robot Titan, see the movie below. He attracts a lot of attention, and scares people a little, but also puts them at ease quickly by using humour.

The very small robots, like Keepon, are perhaps relying partly on their smallness to endear people and to easily establish contact with people. An interesting thought experiment is to imagine a really big Keepon, say 1.50m, trying to interact with a five year old autistic boy. Do you think it will be just as succesful as the small one? I do not think so. Or imagine a 2m Paro robot ‘baby’ seal. Hmmm, that might actually have an effect similar to that of those giant teddy bears you can win at fairs. Holding them in your lap would be difficult though.

Posted in Social Robotics | Leave a comment